|
1851-1921 By Elmer Davis Originally published 1921 |
| E-mail This Page to a Friend |
|
|
|
|
made it advisable for the American people to forget trivial objections and give their consideration rather to the things the President had done. He had, after all, won the chief points for which he was contending as the constitutionally designated negotiator for the American people, and won them, if at the price of some concessions, over strenuous opposition. It was unlikely that any other American official would ever bee able to impose American views so extensively on the other great powers of the world.
There can be no doubt that much of the antagonism which finally wrecked Mr. Wilson's peace plans was due to his personality rather than his accomplishments, to his methods rather than his results. It seemed to The Times that ordinary common sense might suggest that the people whom he represented should give first consideration to the work which he had done, and to the ,effect of that work upon their own interests, rather than to their opinions of Mr. Wilson as an individual. No doubt, some conscientious opponents of the League took this point of view, and based their opposition to the Treaty on an honest conviction that it was harmful to American interests. But there is evidence everywhere in plain sight that a good many people opposed the Treaty merely because they disliked the President.
Throughout the fight in the Senate and through the campaign of 1920 The Times gave its utmost support to the cause of the League and to those public men who promised to support that cause. The violent debate within the Republican Party as to whether the election of Mr. Harding meant a victory for the League or the utter rejection of the
|
|
|
History of the New York Times Main Menu |
![]() A GREAT New York City running club! Easy to get to by the PATH subway |
![]() Join America On the Move Small Steps to a Healthier Way of Life! |
|
|


|
|
![]() |
| New York City Politics |
|
|
|
|
|
UBERHIPPY |